Comparison

Sanity Alternatives for React and Next.js Developers

Sanity alternatives for React and Next.js: Payload, TinaCMS, and Draftbase compared on price and real features.

DT
Draftbase Team · August 18, 2026 · 7 min read

Sanity's biggest strengths are GROQ, Portable Text, and real-time, many-editor editing. If you're choosing between it and another headless CMS, the best alternatives depend on which of those three you're willing to give up. Pick Payload for a code-first, self-hosted schema with typed output. Pick TinaCMS for Git-backed content a static site already owns. Pick Draftbase for MDX-native content with a typed React SDK instead of a rich-text tree. None of them replicate GROQ exactly. All of them fix a real cost or lock-in problem Sanity has.

Sanity earned its name honestly. GROQ resolves nested references in a single query. A page with three levels of linked content comes back in one round trip, not three. Its real-time layer uses operational transforms, the same approach behind Google Docs. Two editors can type in the same field without a save conflict. Neither is trivial to rebuild, and no alternative below claims to.

What Sanity actually does well

Three features carry most of Sanity's developer mindshare. Name them before picking a replacement.

GROQ lets you write one query that projects, filters, and resolves references at any nesting depth. A blog post with an author reference and three tags comes back fully joined. You get only the fields you asked for. REST APIs from most rivals need a separate call per reference. Or they need a heavier GraphQL query that over-fetches data.

Portable Text stores rich content as a JSON array of typed blocks instead of an HTML string. That's a real win when one paragraph has to render on a web page, a native app, and a PDF export. No HTML parser has to do triple duty. It's also why a Sanity migration is never a five-minute job. Every app that reads the content needs its own Portable Text renderer, and there's no universal one.

Real-time collaboration happens at the field level, not the document level. Two editors can type in different fields of the same entry at once. Neither one triggers a "someone else is editing this" lock. Sanity's Content Lake stores documents in a database built for this, not bolted on top of an old-style content store.

None of that is marketing. It's also not free. The Growth plan runs $15 per seat/month on top of the base. And Portable Text's structured format means every frontend needs its own rendering layer before content shows up anywhere.

The best Sanity alternatives for React and Next.js

Payload: code-first schema, self-hosted by default

Payload defines its schema in TypeScript, not a visual studio. Fields, hooks, and access control all live in code. The schema reviews like any other pull request. Types generate automatically from the config, and the admin UI is a Next.js app you can extend directly. Self-hosting is MIT-licensed and free; managed Payload Cloud starts at $35/month.

Payload is the closest match for teams who liked how Sanity feels to build with. It's a step away from the hosted Content Lake as a separate service to run. It has no GROQ equivalent. It has no many-editor real-time editing either. If either of those is the reason you picked Sanity, Payload will feel like a step back.

TinaCMS: Git-backed, content lives in the repo

TinaCMS stores content as Markdown and MDX files inside your Git repository. A visual editor sits on top for non-technical editors. There's no separate content database to sync, and no API rate limit. Version history is just git log. It's the natural fit for a site that's already static-first and doesn't want a second source of truth for content.

The tradeoff is the one every Git-backed CMS shares. The GitHub Contents API caps directory listings at 1,000 files. It also drops full support above 1 MB per file. That ceiling shows up the moment a content set grows past a small blog. Real-time collaboration doesn't exist here either. Two editors on the same file sort out clashes through Git merges, not field-level operational transforms.

Draftbase: MDX-native storage, typed SDK, no rich-text tree

Draftbase's richText fields store MDX as a plain string, not a Portable Text-style node tree. A paragraph, a table, and a custom <PricingTable /> component all compile the same way. @mdx-js/mdx does the compiling. @draftbase/renderer renders the result as a React Server Component. There's one rendering layer to maintain, whether the content lives in a blog post or a marketing page.

For teams already writing MDX in .mdx files, that's a small mental jump. Adopting Portable Text's block schema is a bigger one. The typed SDK generates a <TemplateName>Fields interface per content template. A field rename shows up as a TypeScript error in CI, not a runtime undefined. Draftbase has no GROQ-equivalent query language yet. It has no field-level real-time editing yet either. Delivery runs on REST and GraphQL with cursor pagination. That covers most content-fetching needs without the deep joins a relational content model demands.

Strapi: the widest plugin ecosystem, still self-hosted MIT

Strapi remains the most-used open-source headless CMS by count, alongside the other free and open-source options worth a look. Its plugin marketplace runs deeper than any option here. Self-hosting is free under MIT. Strapi Cloud starts around $18/month for a single project. It has REST and GraphQL out of the box, and a content-type builder that doesn't require touching code at all.

What it doesn't have is Portable Text's cross-platform rich-text format. It also lacks Sanity's real-time editing. Rich text in Strapi is usually HTML, or a simpler JSON shape. That's closer to an old-style CMS than a structured-content platform.

When is a Sanity alternative overkill?

Not every team leaving Sanity needs to switch. If the pain is only the seat price on a two-person team, check the bill first, it may be free. The Free plan covers 20 seats before Growth pricing kicks in at all. Swapping platforms costs real hours. Every GROQ query gets redone. Every Portable Text renderer gets swapped out, and every editor learns a new admin screen.

The honest trigger for a switch is usually one of three things. The Content Lake's hosted-only model clashes with a data-residency rule. The per-seat price stops scaling once an editorial team passes 10 to 15 people. Or the team never used GROQ's deep joins in the first place. A flatter content model would have been simpler from day one.

That last case is more common than it sounds. A content model with two or three levels of nested references benefits from GROQ. A blog with a post, an author, and a couple of tags doesn't need it, the shape How to Choose the Best Headless CMS walks through in more detail. Every alternative above handles that shape without friction. Check which one describes your content before picking a replacement on pricing alone.

Sanity alternatives compared

PlatformGROQ equivalentReal-time editingSelf-hostEntry price
SanityYes (GROQ)Field-level, built-inNoFree tier, then $15/seat/mo
PayloadNoNoYes, MITFree self-hosted, $35/mo cloud
TinaCMSNoGit merges onlyYes, content in repoFree (OSS)
DraftbaseNo, REST/GraphQLNot yetNoFree Hobby tier, $49/mo Startup
StrapiNoNoYes, MITFree self-hosted, ~$18/mo cloud

The underused angle: Portable Text is the actual migration cost, not the seat price

Most "Sanity alternatives" posts lead with pricing. The real cost shows up sooner. Portable Text is a JSON block format with no shared open standard. Every frontend that renders Sanity content needs its own Portable Text serializer. Every migration away from Sanity needs a script that walks that block tree and rewrites it for the new platform. A flat MDX string, by comparison, is plain text. A grep can search it, and a diff shows it line by line. That's a small detail in a feature comparison. It's a large one the week you actually migrate.

Choosing the right one

Pick Payload if the schema-as-code workflow is what you liked about Sanity. You'll need to be fine losing GROQ. Pick TinaCMS if the site is already static and Git is the source of truth you want to keep. Pick Draftbase if the content is mostly MDX-shaped already and a typed SDK matters more than a query language. Start free on the Hobby plan, no card required. See whether flat MDX storage cuts the rendering work Portable Text adds.

OptionVerdictProsCons
SanityBest when you need GROQ's deep reference joins or true field-level real-time editing.
  • GROQ resolves nested references in one query
  • Field-level real-time collaboration
  • Portable Text renders across web, app, and PDF
  • Generous free tier for small teams
  • $15/seat/mo on Growth adds up fast
  • Portable Text needs a custom renderer per frontend
  • Content Lake is hosted-only, no self-host option
  • Migrating out means rewriting every Portable Text consumer
PayloadBest for teams who want Sanity's code-first ergonomics without the hosted Content Lake.
  • Schema defined in TypeScript, reviews like code
  • MIT-licensed, free to self-host
  • Auto-generated types from config
  • Admin UI is a Next.js app you can extend
  • No GROQ-equivalent query language
  • No real-time multi-editor collaboration
  • Self-hosting means owning the infrastructure
  • Cloud tier starts at $35/mo for managed hosting
DraftbaseBest for MDX-heavy content with a typed SDK, if you don't need GROQ-style joins.
  • MDX stored as a plain string, one rendering layer
  • Typed SDK catches field renames at compile time
  • REST and GraphQL delivery with cursor pagination
  • Free Hobby tier, no card required
  • No GROQ-equivalent query language
  • No real-time field-level editing yet
  • Newer platform, smaller plugin ecosystem than Strapi
  • Not the pick for deep multi-level reference models

Ship content that's built to be found

Draftbase generates schema, structured data, and a fast MDX editor for every post.

Frequently asked questions

What is the closest alternative to Sanity for React developers?

Payload is the closest match for teams who liked Sanity's code-first schema but want to self-host instead of using the hosted Content Lake. It has no GROQ equivalent and no real-time collaboration.

Does any Sanity alternative support GROQ?

No. GROQ is Sanity's own query language and no competitor implements it. Payload, Draftbase, and Strapi use REST or GraphQL instead, which cover most content-fetching needs but require more calls for deeply nested references.

Is there a free, self-hosted alternative to Sanity?

Yes. Payload and Strapi are both MIT-licensed and free to self-host, with no per-seat or API-call pricing. TinaCMS is also free and stores content directly in your Git repository.

Why would a team leave Sanity for a different CMS?

The three most common reasons are per-seat pricing that stops scaling past 10 to 15 editors, a data-residency requirement the hosted-only Content Lake can't meet, and a content model that never needed GROQ's deep joins in the first place.

Does Draftbase support real-time collaborative editing like Sanity?

Not yet. Draftbase stores content as plain MDX strings with a typed SDK and REST/GraphQL delivery, but field-level real-time editing is a Sanity-specific feature none of the alternatives in this comparison replicate.

Related reading

Go deeper on Headless CMS